Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arlinda Rushiti vs Amandine Monnot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rushiti vs Monnot analysis and find out who is favored!
Arlinda Rushiti vs Amandine Monnot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rushiti has won 42.27% of points on his second serve, while Monnot has won 44.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rushiti, in recent form, has won 53.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Monnot has won 55.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.05% and 41.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rushiti has saved 55.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Monnot has saved 55.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rushiti has won 51.22% of matches played (W/L 21/ 20), with Monnot winning 56.6% (W/L 30/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rushiti has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 45/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 28/ 49). Monnot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 38/ 35), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Rushiti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11), where as Monnot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rushiti has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.76 while Monnot has played against players with an average rank of 299.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rushiti has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Monnot has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rushiti has converted 49.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Monnot has converted 48.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rushiti 0 - 0 Monnot
845
Rank
352
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
542
Rank
501
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
53% (201-177)
Career Total W/L
51% (83-79)
64% (14-8)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arlinda Rushiti | Amandine Monnot |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (14/8) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (32/18) | 50% (26/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (239/207) | 54% (248/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:43 | 1:34:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 258 | 310.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (930/1396) | 60% (904/1513) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (585/930) | 65% (588/904) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (197/466) | 44% (269/609) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (90/181) | 49% (93/189) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (663/1408) | 46% (677/1472) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 50% (11/11) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 27% (11/3) |
Arlinda Rushiti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Olga Helmi
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Lois Newberry
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Diana Mascenikova
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Carolann Delaunay
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Olga Golas
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Amandine Monnot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Amandine Monnot
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Danielle Daley
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Failla
Player
Amandine Monnot
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Emma Wilson
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Ramialison
Player
Amandine Monnot
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Amandine Monnot
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Sonia Cassani
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Audrey Albie
Player
Amandine Monnot
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rushiti Vs Monnot Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
